Virtual Tour
Gallery

Latest Comments



26 February 2008

Archbishop Rowan Williams and Sharia law

The hysteria that has greeted the comments of Archbishop Rowan Williams about a limited accommodation between some aspects of Sharia law and English law reveals something profoundly disturbing about how we regard the Moslem Other.


07 January 2008

Separate Communities Cost

Sectarianism and the deep divisions within Northern Ireland could be costing the public purse up to £1.5bn a year, an official report has concluded.


View more >>

Passeth the Hour, Passeth the Man

The imminent departure of Ian Paisley from leadership of the Democratic Unionist Party and from being First Minister – following his departure from being Moderator of the Free Presbyterian Church – means that a dominating presence will be no more (or at least much reduced).  Some reflection on his role in Ulster life over 50 years may now be possible.

 

Ian Paisley had a deep sense of the religious and political fears that were so much part of the Ulster Protestant psyche.  He could play on them superbly well.  He had a genus for raucous theatre – that this was tragedy for many people has been left unsaid in the glowing tributes.

 

The outsider spent a lifetime throwing rocks at the key institutions of the Ulster Protestant community – the Unionist Party and the Presbyterian Church.  He often reduced them to immobility and fear – leadership always knew that they would come under fierce and relentless criticism if they sought accommodation or to develop relationships.  Audaciously in calling his party the Democratic Unionist Party and his church the Free Presbyterian Church he was making a claim that the community’s key institutions had apostatized.  Finally he effectively destroyed the Unionist Party.

 

The Ulster Protestant community entered a deep crisis in the late 1960s – which was around how to respond to an increasingly restless minority in its midst and how to deal with a changing Britain which was now bereft of empire.  Paisley was at once a symptom of that crisis and someone who deepened it by his actions.  To find a positive way forward was always going to be difficult but Paisley made the task impossible.

 

Even Paisley discerned, however, that reality couldn’t be kept indefinitely at bay and that fierce negativity had its limits.  A deal had to be done.  The outsider became insider.  The big issue is: What is the current position of the Protestant community?  In what state has Paisley left it?  He has been a bridge for some to come over to pragmatism and compromise.  Many, however, have been left unprepared for the necessity of a deal – they have been fed on the junk food of no surrender.  The drum of betrayal beats – but how loudly?

 

 

 

David Stevens